Thanks for this. I have certain inalienable rights endowed to me by my creator, and my state constitution specifically recognizes that "[t]he enumeration of rights in this Article shall not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the people." My constitution recognizes that "no human authority shall, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience." Equally important, it recognizes that I have other inalienable rights, which I contend includes right to choose my own medical provider, right to medical autonomy and right to informed consent. The abandonment of ethics and the basic principles of medical ethics in all of this has been astounding, and I encourage all of you to read the rules of medical ethics in your state along with national norms of medical ethics, including where enshrined in federal law. I stand strong with all of you in this battle, armed with the clear unequivocal direction God gave me that what He gave me (natural immunity) was enough and that I should not abandon the teachings I had previously learned. See Romans16:17-18
"I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them. For such people are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery, they deceive the minds of naïve people."
Practitioners are obligated to obtain voluntary informed consent for vaccination, as acknowledged by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) in a letter I received dated 20 September 2021:
"Practitioners have an obligation to obtain informed consent for treatment, including vaccination.
Informed consent is a person's voluntary decision about health care that is made with knowledge and
understanding of the benefits and risks involved."
Also, please see my formal notification/complaint to the regulator of medical practitioners, AHPRA, re Paul Kelly, the Chief Medical Officer of Australia - he facilitated the violation of voluntary informed consent in Australia when he capitulated to political pressure from then Australian prime minister Scott Morrison and National Cabinet.
This is such a massive scandal, which has resulted in the exploitation of people in Australia with highly questionable vaccine products...and the theft of personal autonomy and bodily integrity.
Perfectly stated. Just as the essential feature of being free means that no human being must ever have to justify their existence to another, so too no human being must ever be coerced into taking an injection into their body. This is not a debating point. Any attempt to coerce a person to take an injection, whether it’s ‘experimental’ or not, must be viewed as a crime against humanity. And because it IS a crime against humanity the perpetrators of that crime must be held to the highest account for their crimes. Again, and on this point there can be no debate.
I agree in principle, and surely, politics muddling science is the worst thing about vaccine mandates. A mandate for a vaccination is particularly reprehensible before everything about that vaccine is known and made public. They claimed there wasn’t time for that, while discrediting all other potential treatments, and lied about the ability of a vaccination to prevent infection. Thus the fault for resistance to vaccination is theirs.
I replied, however to another post that railed against the mandated smallpox vaccinations. I asked, since it was the first disease vaccinated against and the only human disease to be wiped out, isn’t the alternative, um, smallpox? The author didn’t reply.
There’s a lovely photograph of a child with smallpox on wikipedia, if interested. The end result of the discussion, for me, is still undecided.
Nothing exposes people to a greater risk of harm than taking away their right to free medical consent. Once we give up the right to free medical consent, we have no guaranteed rights at all. Let us assume that the first vaccine ever mandated were a perfect vaccine and has eradicated the specific disease without causing any other medical harms. The next time however a mandated injection could be intended as a weapon of war, officially justified by the success of the former mandate. It is no skin off the tyrant’s nose to cure distrustful people of one disease in order to be able to kill them more efficiently with another.
Vaccines contain poisons. Poisons have never been good for an individuals health. Smallpox vaccines contain poisons. They have never been good for an individuals health.
Smallpox has not been wiped out as it is a conceived disease like all internal diseases which have suspiciously similar symptoms. Big pharma and medics just rename things to cover the tracks of vaccine harms and deaths .
Statistics are manipulated by those who profit by keeping people sick, but are used to suggest that correlation over many decades shows a disease has gone, conveniently ignoring the improvements in public health and nutrition which actually reduced diseases.
So that's your best shot is it Ken, a feeble attempt at an insult? Yes, I've seen that photo, and read the article some time ago. I research properly unlike you. I wouldn't have done all the articles that I have done if I hadn't.
Are you so bigoted and biased that that is all you double check? Haven't you even checked other Wikipedia articles and wondered why they are so pro-vaccine?? Are you not aware of the deaths caused by smallpox vaccines?? This is what happens when you inject poisons.
If they don't bring death then they will likely cause harm depending on the state of health of the individual and what is really in each vial. Nobody actually checks before hand do they?
I used to believe the smallpox lies and that Jenner was a marvel.
But it was all a load of bollox. If you can't say why it is a good idea to inject poisons or foreign bodies into a person then very sadly you are not very bright are you? Or perhaps you like being poisoned? But that would be the sign of insanity wouldn't it.
Get a life Ken and research properly. A MidWesternDoctor has done a good article for example.
Thanks for this. I have certain inalienable rights endowed to me by my creator, and my state constitution specifically recognizes that "[t]he enumeration of rights in this Article shall not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the people." My constitution recognizes that "no human authority shall, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience." Equally important, it recognizes that I have other inalienable rights, which I contend includes right to choose my own medical provider, right to medical autonomy and right to informed consent. The abandonment of ethics and the basic principles of medical ethics in all of this has been astounding, and I encourage all of you to read the rules of medical ethics in your state along with national norms of medical ethics, including where enshrined in federal law. I stand strong with all of you in this battle, armed with the clear unequivocal direction God gave me that what He gave me (natural immunity) was enough and that I should not abandon the teachings I had previously learned. See Romans16:17-18
"I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them. For such people are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery, they deceive the minds of naïve people."
Well said. The powers that be have no right to poison you or any of the children of God. Poisoning people is evil.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2021/08/23/should-christians-take-a-vaccine/
Practitioners are obligated to obtain voluntary informed consent for vaccination, as acknowledged by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) in a letter I received dated 20 September 2021:
"Practitioners have an obligation to obtain informed consent for treatment, including vaccination.
Informed consent is a person's voluntary decision about health care that is made with knowledge and
understanding of the benefits and risks involved."
https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/10/response-from-ahpra-re-informed-consent.pdf
In a letter dated 17 November 2022, the Australian Department of Health and Aged Care has also confirmed to me:
"Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent
procedures for other vaccinations."
https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/11/mc22-018819-signed-highlighted-1.pdf
Under 'Valid consent', The Australian Immunisation Handbook notes:
"For consent to be legally valid, the following elements must be present...It must be given voluntarily
in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation...It can only be given after the potential
risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have
been explained to the person."
https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/contents/vaccination-procedures/preparing-for-vaccination#valid-consent
People who are vaccinated under duress cannot give valid consent.
For more background on the diabolical situation in Australia, see my email to AHPRA: Reckless disregard for voluntary informed consent - the AHPRA Position Statement 9 March 2021, forwarded 31 July 2023: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2023/07/reckless-disregard-for-voluntary-informed-consent-the-ahpra-position-statement-9-march-2021.pdf
Also, please see my formal notification/complaint to the regulator of medical practitioners, AHPRA, re Paul Kelly, the Chief Medical Officer of Australia - he facilitated the violation of voluntary informed consent in Australia when he capitulated to political pressure from then Australian prime minister Scott Morrison and National Cabinet.
See the detail in this notification: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2023/06/notification-to-ahpra-re-medical-practitioner-paul-kelly.pdf
This is such a massive scandal, which has resulted in the exploitation of people in Australia with highly questionable vaccine products...and the theft of personal autonomy and bodily integrity.
Perfectly stated. Just as the essential feature of being free means that no human being must ever have to justify their existence to another, so too no human being must ever be coerced into taking an injection into their body. This is not a debating point. Any attempt to coerce a person to take an injection, whether it’s ‘experimental’ or not, must be viewed as a crime against humanity. And because it IS a crime against humanity the perpetrators of that crime must be held to the highest account for their crimes. Again, and on this point there can be no debate.
I agree in principle, and surely, politics muddling science is the worst thing about vaccine mandates. A mandate for a vaccination is particularly reprehensible before everything about that vaccine is known and made public. They claimed there wasn’t time for that, while discrediting all other potential treatments, and lied about the ability of a vaccination to prevent infection. Thus the fault for resistance to vaccination is theirs.
I replied, however to another post that railed against the mandated smallpox vaccinations. I asked, since it was the first disease vaccinated against and the only human disease to be wiped out, isn’t the alternative, um, smallpox? The author didn’t reply.
There’s a lovely photograph of a child with smallpox on wikipedia, if interested. The end result of the discussion, for me, is still undecided.
Nothing exposes people to a greater risk of harm than taking away their right to free medical consent. Once we give up the right to free medical consent, we have no guaranteed rights at all. Let us assume that the first vaccine ever mandated were a perfect vaccine and has eradicated the specific disease without causing any other medical harms. The next time however a mandated injection could be intended as a weapon of war, officially justified by the success of the former mandate. It is no skin off the tyrant’s nose to cure distrustful people of one disease in order to be able to kill them more efficiently with another.
That’s clear enough. Thank you.
Vaccines contain poisons. Poisons have never been good for an individuals health. Smallpox vaccines contain poisons. They have never been good for an individuals health.
Smallpox has not been wiped out as it is a conceived disease like all internal diseases which have suspiciously similar symptoms. Big pharma and medics just rename things to cover the tracks of vaccine harms and deaths .
Statistics are manipulated by those who profit by keeping people sick, but are used to suggest that correlation over many decades shows a disease has gone, conveniently ignoring the improvements in public health and nutrition which actually reduced diseases.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/what-is-the-flu-aka-covid-19-and
Well that sums that up.
You’re a crackpot.
Just to be certain I searched “conceived disease” although I was sure it wasn’t a thing. It isn’t.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox
Take a look at the pic.
So that's your best shot is it Ken, a feeble attempt at an insult? Yes, I've seen that photo, and read the article some time ago. I research properly unlike you. I wouldn't have done all the articles that I have done if I hadn't.
Are you so bigoted and biased that that is all you double check? Haven't you even checked other Wikipedia articles and wondered why they are so pro-vaccine?? Are you not aware of the deaths caused by smallpox vaccines?? This is what happens when you inject poisons.
If they don't bring death then they will likely cause harm depending on the state of health of the individual and what is really in each vial. Nobody actually checks before hand do they?
I used to believe the smallpox lies and that Jenner was a marvel.
But it was all a load of bollox. If you can't say why it is a good idea to inject poisons or foreign bodies into a person then very sadly you are not very bright are you? Or perhaps you like being poisoned? But that would be the sign of insanity wouldn't it.
Get a life Ken and research properly. A MidWesternDoctor has done a good article for example.
I love this. Shared to LinkedIn and will cross post.
Thank you for making what should be obvious so crystal clear.
Do you know the history of deaths caused by smallpox vaccines? I would buy a book.